The Leveretts comment on the Amiri affair.
As we wrote in April,
"[H]ow could it be that Amiri, who would have been 31 years old at the time of
his defection, would have had meaningful access to anything sensitive about
Iran's nuclear program--much less to have had such access "for at least a
decade"? Unless Amiri completed his doctorate as a teenager and was given a
senior position in Iran's nuclear program with high level access at the age of
20 or 21, this claim literally does not add up."
Now we learn, see here, that the CIA apparently tried to pay Amiri $5 million.
Along with trying to figure out the details of Amiri's trajectory over the last
year, journalists ought to be focusing on what the Agency's willingness to pay
$5 million to a hyped-up source signals about the U.S. Intelligence Community's
desperation to make a prosecutor's case against the Islamic Republic. Indeed,
the CIA and the rest of the Intelligence Community seem sufficiently desperate
to make their case that they will pay taxpayer dollars to gotten-up defectors
who might be prepared to say--for the right price--what Washington elites want to
hear. As we noted in our April piece, if the CIA and its partners in the
Intelligence Community are unable to make a case against Iran, "how could
Washington argue for intensified sanctions against the Islamic Republic--much
less keep the military option 'on the table'."